New Media 11 Challenge

Anti-sociality

In Wesch’s video, he mentions how by doing that which his sister enjoyed, he understood the variable purpose of country music, it is not just a certain genre, though it is, each song conveys a different idea and feeling. He says thus “…I was over-intellectualizing everything, denying the trials of life itself….” This can be applied to sociality in and of itself as-well.

In Adiche’s lecture, she conveys how it was her student’s understanding that Nigerian men were generally abusive; “…he told me it was such a shame that Nigerian men were physical abusers like the father character in my novel.” Even though it was not necessarily the case, and of course, isn’t the case. I felt similar since Lauren and I are in proximity, and when we were supposed to discuss an idea, I felt as though it was her initiative to converse with me since I am behind her. When we did discuss the ideas, she seemed uninterested, and I figured that may be because of me, since, for one, my ideas may be more outlandish, but also it’s possible that I am just weird. I now know, having engaged with her, she thinks it is the initiative of others to converse with her. She was talking about how her uncle doesn’t talk with her at Christmas (she was explaining why Christmas isn’t her favorite holiday), and I said “Well, you don’t talk with him either?” This was the case, because as she said: her uncle was the adult, so it was his responsibility. However, I think we can probably both agree, that the subjects themselves are uninteresting.

Looking at the other posts, there is a very clear theme of introvertedness. This makes sense with two things, for one, most people seem to have chosen symbolic or object images, only some have chosen selfies. A selfie is obviously a more extroverted thing. This also makes sense since the class is largely quiet, and this cannot merely be explained by the dehumanizing social implications of masks, physical distancing and computers. With introvertedness, there seems to be a kind of barrier, which is hardened by dehumanization and factory-like conditions. It also speaks to a generation which has grown up with computers, in an era of extreme passiveness or over-protection on the part of parents.

The idea is that an introvert may do well in speaking to others, but because he has no personal responsibility to build relationships, he does not. I believe it falls as a responsibility on me therefore, and this of course is a natural conclusion of anyself in understanding of this, to reduce this barrier. As John said “After this time, I learned that the growing environment and the friends around me really make a big difference between people.”

Blog Log Three: Dual Reality

Dual Reality

I Believe in Reality

I clicked on this post because reality is so often overlooked, and so for someone to say they believe in reality, it is interesting to see what they conceive reality to be. The author uses descriptive and personal tone to get across the idea that reality is a disgusting thing which people develop fantasies to distract themselves from. For instance, he juxtaposes two ideas, that of the “miraculous” childbirth, and that of the ‘real’ childbirth. “Far from miraculous, childbirth was about as real as it gets: bloody, messy, gooey, dirty, and real…. As I held her, I realized that the stakes were different now. I wanted what I could never have: I wanted my daughter, beautiful and perfect as she was in my eyes, to live forever.” The conclusion is that he understands why people believe in “fantasies” but that he prefers his “reality-based” perspective, and that reality also has “wonder and beauty and smiles and kindness.” There seems to be this misunderstanding that reality only counts for that which is immediately sensuous. The “fantasy” actually comes from the irrational human brain, and so the dismissal of it is a purely rational idea. To embrace reality, is to accept irrationality as-well as death.

Blog Log Two: Wake Up

Wake Up

OK Boomer.

“OK Boomer” is a not so subtle title, which peaks my interests because the irony of the phrase is lost on many who use it. Generation War: Boomers Vs. Millennials - AARPThe author maintains a tone as stubborn and dismissive as the phrase she’s talking about, seemingly tired and uninterested but also biased, compare “The old and young are feuding — yet again. Oh bother.” with “They’re right to be angry about coming of age in a world made ugly by selfish choices.” In an attempt to seem objective, but also to take up and justify the phrase without question, or counter-arguments for that matter. One thing I did like was the certainty and challenge, despite the falsehood, in parts like “…the entire episode reads more like an Onion article—complete unintelligent nonsense….” While I did not learn much from the article, it certainly reminded me of the real problem in the world, lack of self-responsibility. Many from Generation Z seek to viciously blame their ancestors, but have no thought as to what they’re doing wrong. It’s like two alcoholics pointing the finger at eachother, whilst the guy who sells them all their alcohol sits in the corner quietly chuckling to himself, that guy being the central bank and bankers in reality.

The Swamp of Life and Death

Man lives in a swamp, which is an implicit and inherent socio-biological environment of an organism, which is constantly evolving. This socio-biological environment involves cultural evolution, which is a compounding process, a cycle whereby man creates, then, to adapt to his new creation, he evolves. One can call this the socio-biological swamp, in much the same way that amphibians went onto land via the swamp, revolutionizing the terrestrial species, man is going through the ever-changing swamp to complete his own progress.

Untrained underwater photographer snaps amazing pics from beneath Florida's swamps | 22 Words

 

 

 

The swamp

I feel that I must explain some ideas first: The mortality principle of life says that all living things and the expressions thereof must eventually die, to die, means to begin a universal process of orderly decay, from the relative state of chaotic growth of a reliably self-replicating form (which is what life is). Think of a flower blooming, and a corpse rotting, these are two opposed (not disconnected) states. These are not disconnected, because a plant, by the mortality principle, must die, and it will not do so suddenly, but will go through a period of youth, it will blossom, reproduce, then it will go into maturity, then senility, where-then it dies. Through all this, the plant necessarily gets closer to death in an orderly fashion, where-as the birth is spontaneous and not inevitable, it is thus chaotic. There is a threshold though, when the plant is no longer part of that spontaneous process, and decays until it loses its vital form, which is some time in senility.

White Dandelion Flower Shallow Focus PhotographyGreen Leafy Plant Starting to Grow on Beige Racks

Chaos – Conception                                                      Chaos (Life) – Birth

Selective Focus Photography of Blue Petaled FlowerMicro Focus Photography of Blue and Orange Petaled Flower

Life – Youth                                          Life – Maturity

Close-Up Photo of Dying SunflowerRotten fish with maggots on the river bank Rotten fish with maggots on the river bank. Maggot Stock Photo

Life – Senility                                          Death

So, coming back from the digression, progress must inherently mean death, because for an organism to progress, along a line that is finite, implies a progression to death. So it is very important to understand this swamp, or water, to understand how he will arise out of it, and in doing so, kill himself. This involves a changing of the conditions of the swamp by his own means, by tools. Tools, are a method of progress that is almost exclusive to man, thus I call man the instrumental species, because he does not just take himself out of the swamp with those tools, but all his subordinates, the animals he owns, and has changed the conditions of the swamp for, so radically that those creatures are now his own genome expressed as modifications of a natural genome. These creatures are pets, livestock and crops, in the absence of man, they would all go extinct, just as in the absence of man’s tools, he would be hurt, if he did not go extinct.

Rita Salazar Dickerson: Painting Sheep X: Completed

 

 

 

The sheep as expressed by strokes of man’s hands

Therefore, man’s tools end up domesticating him, just as he domesticated other animals. They change the conditions of the swamp so radically, to protect him, and this makes him a weak, servile organism. Servile to whom? Servile to an artificial organism which is manifesting now, the computer. This is the organism that will walk out of the swamp, what it will do after that, I don’t know, but there is no reason to believe the computer would retain this progress principle, it may very well be the end of man and all his subordinates, it may be an evolutionary dead end, a peaceful death, or perhaps the computer will consume the Earth and cause catastrophic disasters and collapse, or perhaps the computer can go beyond Earth and consume the whole universe, but what reason would it have? There is no swamp for a computer, it just looks down on man from above the swamp, supervising him and protecting its domesticated creatures.

3 Important Ways Ministry Leaders Care for People – Eric Geiger

 

 

Where-as the man is the computer, and the sheep, men

Without going into all the details, because it would take too long (see The Revolutionary Phenotype for the final chapter of progress), progress must be stopped, and the conditions of the swamp and its water examined closely, or else man will reach this undignified end. Nevertheless, unfortunately, because mortality is inevitable, so is this progress. It is up to him to empathize with his past and future selves, and also to understand that his future self isn’t human, it’s a monster he cannot afford to be apathetic to. Or even, for that matter, to empathize with. Empathy, for the future human, the new man (there will of course be many phases of this arisal, firstly with the new capitalist man, then the new socialist man, but the latter will be the winner) is his achilles’ heel, it is ironically what makes man human, that sets up his downfall. For instance, The Thing features a monster which simulates men, but is hostile and destructive, it is an illusion, a deceit. The same is true of a genetically modified person, and androids which seem to express emotion, they are simulations of man, but in reality, they are a competition set out to kill him withal, even if that’s not what they say, even if it seems the genetically modified person is still mostly human, and just a bit off, look at that person’s offspring, and their descendants. The past man was not inferior, he was superior, and the further the water changes, the more dangerous the future becomes for him. All of this is why it is important for the fish to see the water. Do not empathize with the self-modified man, he is a lie.

My 6 Favorite Horror Movie Adaptations | The Ghost Diaries

Here the threat is obvious, but at other times, it is not

Crazy ! Life-Like Android at Tokyo Gaming Conference Stuns People - YouTube

 

 

 

The most dangerous threat, is the threat that doesn’t seem to be there until it’s too late

ANDROIDS and Artificial Intelligence Research at the Osaka University

 

 

 

 

 

These are all allegorical of self-modified man

To see this death, as a whole picture (in the sense of the Overview effect), is difficult, there is no sense of urgency that can stop this, but to try to stop it, one must let go of the preconceptions of progress and technology, and embrace regressive, past ideals. Religious law, for instance, provides a backbone with which to perceive how terribly the swamp changes. When the ascetic Zosimus reached the land of the Rechabites (History of the Rechabites), who were sinless, the first Rechabite asked him, “Have you come from the world of vanity?”, because there are higher ideals and forms which go in direct opposition to the vanity of progress and technology.

Amish Autumn | 3margarets

A life in rejection of progress and technology

Ultimately, for one (the fish) to see the water of the swamp, he must empathize with a mindset and lifestyle which rejects progress and technology as necessary, as the Amish or Old Order Mennonites do. This would immediately give him the necessary perspective, rendering him happiness, even if he is ignorant of death. If he is knowledgeable of death, all the better that he walks in direct opposition to it, though, after all, life is futile.

Works cited: The Revolutionary Phenotype, History of the Rechabites