Man lives in a swamp, which is an implicit and inherent socio-biological environment of an organism, which is constantly evolving. This socio-biological environment involves cultural evolution, which is a compounding process, a cycle whereby man creates, then, to adapt to his new creation, he evolves. One can call this the socio-biological swamp, in much the same way that amphibians went onto land via the swamp, revolutionizing the terrestrial species, man is going through the ever-changing swamp to complete his own progress.
The swamp
I feel that I must explain some ideas first: The mortality principle of life says that all living things and the expressions thereof must eventually die, to die, means to begin a universal process of orderly decay, from the relative state of chaotic growth of a reliably self-replicating form (which is what life is). Think of a flower blooming, and a corpse rotting, these are two opposed (not disconnected) states. These are not disconnected, because a plant, by the mortality principle, must die, and it will not do so suddenly, but will go through a period of youth, it will blossom, reproduce, then it will go into maturity, then senility, where-then it dies. Through all this, the plant necessarily gets closer to death in an orderly fashion, where-as the birth is spontaneous and not inevitable, it is thus chaotic. There is a threshold though, when the plant is no longer part of that spontaneous process, and decays until it loses its vital form, which is some time in senility.
Chaos – Conception Chaos (Life) – Birth
Life – Youth Life – Maturity
Life – Senility Death
So, coming back from the digression, progress must inherently mean death, because for an organism to progress, along a line that is finite, implies a progression to death. So it is very important to understand this swamp, or water, to understand how he will arise out of it, and in doing so, kill himself. This involves a changing of the conditions of the swamp by his own means, by tools. Tools, are a method of progress that is almost exclusive to man, thus I call man the instrumental species, because he does not just take himself out of the swamp with those tools, but all his subordinates, the animals he owns, and has changed the conditions of the swamp for, so radically that those creatures are now his own genome expressed as modifications of a natural genome. These creatures are pets, livestock and crops, in the absence of man, they would all go extinct, just as in the absence of man’s tools, he would be hurt, if he did not go extinct.
The sheep as expressed by strokes of man’s hands
Therefore, man’s tools end up domesticating him, just as he domesticated other animals. They change the conditions of the swamp so radically, to protect him, and this makes him a weak, servile organism. Servile to whom? Servile to an artificial organism which is manifesting now, the computer. This is the organism that will walk out of the swamp, what it will do after that, I don’t know, but there is no reason to believe the computer would retain this progress principle, it may very well be the end of man and all his subordinates, it may be an evolutionary dead end, a peaceful death, or perhaps the computer will consume the Earth and cause catastrophic disasters and collapse, or perhaps the computer can go beyond Earth and consume the whole universe, but what reason would it have? There is no swamp for a computer, it just looks down on man from above the swamp, supervising him and protecting its domesticated creatures.
Where-as the man is the computer, and the sheep, men
Without going into all the details, because it would take too long (see The Revolutionary Phenotype for the final chapter of progress), progress must be stopped, and the conditions of the swamp and its water examined closely, or else man will reach this undignified end. Nevertheless, unfortunately, because mortality is inevitable, so is this progress. It is up to him to empathize with his past and future selves, and also to understand that his future self isn’t human, it’s a monster he cannot afford to be apathetic to. Or even, for that matter, to empathize with. Empathy, for the future human, the new man (there will of course be many phases of this arisal, firstly with the new capitalist man, then the new socialist man, but the latter will be the winner) is his achilles’ heel, it is ironically what makes man human, that sets up his downfall. For instance, The Thing features a monster which simulates men, but is hostile and destructive, it is an illusion, a deceit. The same is true of a genetically modified person, and androids which seem to express emotion, they are simulations of man, but in reality, they are a competition set out to kill him withal, even if that’s not what they say, even if it seems the genetically modified person is still mostly human, and just a bit off, look at that person’s offspring, and their descendants. The past man was not inferior, he was superior, and the further the water changes, the more dangerous the future becomes for him. All of this is why it is important for the fish to see the water. Do not empathize with the self-modified man, he is a lie.
Here the threat is obvious, but at other times, it is not
The most dangerous threat, is the threat that doesn’t seem to be there until it’s too late
These are all allegorical of self-modified man
To see this death, as a whole picture (in the sense of the Overview effect), is difficult, there is no sense of urgency that can stop this, but to try to stop it, one must let go of the preconceptions of progress and technology, and embrace regressive, past ideals. Religious law, for instance, provides a backbone with which to perceive how terribly the swamp changes. When the ascetic Zosimus reached the land of the Rechabites (History of the Rechabites), who were sinless, the first Rechabite asked him, “Have you come from the world of vanity?”, because there are higher ideals and forms which go in direct opposition to the vanity of progress and technology.
A life in rejection of progress and technology
Ultimately, for one (the fish) to see the water of the swamp, he must empathize with a mindset and lifestyle which rejects progress and technology as necessary, as the Amish or Old Order Mennonites do. This would immediately give him the necessary perspective, rendering him happiness, even if he is ignorant of death. If he is knowledgeable of death, all the better that he walks in direct opposition to it, though, after all, life is futile.
Works cited: The Revolutionary Phenotype, History of the Rechabites