Part I: Preparation of a standard absorption curve for FeSCN+2
Standard | 0.20M Fe(NO3)3 | 0.0020 M KSCN | 0.100M HNO3 | [FeSCN+2] | Absorbance |
A
|
10.0 mL | 0.0 mL | 15.0 mL | 0.0M | 0.0 |
B
|
10.0 mL | 1.0 mL | 14.0 mL | 8.0×10^-5 | 0.304 |
C
|
10.0 mL | 1.5 mL | 13.5 mL | 1.2×10^-4 | 0.500 |
D
|
10.0 mL | 2.0 mL | 13.0 mL | 1.6×10^-4 | 0.670 |
E
|
10.0 mL | 2.5 mL | 12.5 mL | 2.0×10^-4 | 1.070 |
F
|
10.0 mL | 3.0 mL | 12.0 mL | 2.4×10^-4 | 1.080 |
EQUATION: y=4862.1x-0.0443 R2=0.9659
Part 2: Measuring Equilibrium
Test Solution | 0.0020 M Fe(NO3)3 | 0.0020 M
KSCN |
0.10 M
HNO3 |
Initial [Fe+3] | Initial [SCN–] | Absorbance | Equilibrium
[FeSCN+2]* |
I
|
5.0 mL | 0 | 5.0 mL | -0.0010M | 0.0 | -0.006 | 0 |
II
|
5.0 mL | 1.0 mL | 4.0 mL | 0.0010M | 2.0×10^-4 | 0.159 | 4.2×10^-5 |
III
|
5.0 mL | 2.0 mL | 3.0 mL | 0.0010M | 4.0×10^-4 | 0.378 | 8.7×10^-5 |
IV
|
5.0 mL | 3.0 mL | 2.0 mL | 0.0010M | 6.0×10^-4 | 0.534 | 1.4×10^-4 |
V
|
5.0 mL | 4.0 mL | 1.0 mL | 0.0010M | 8.0×10^-4 | 0.716 | 1.6×10^-4 |
VI
|
5.0 mL | 5.0 mL | 0.0 mL | 0.0010M | 1.0×10^-3 | 0.820 | 1.8×10^-4 |
* To be determined from the standard graph equation.
ANALYSIS:
- Use your graph equation to calculate the equilibrium concentrations of FeSCN+2.
- Prepare and ICE chart for each test solution (II – VI) and calculate the value of Keq for each of your 5 tests solutions.
ICE CHARTS
Test Solution II
Keq = 277.5 |
Fe3+ + SCN– ⇄ FeSCN2+ | ||
I
|
0.0010M | 0.00020M | 0 |
C
|
-x | -x | +x |
E
|
0.000958 | 0.000158 | 4.2×10^-5 |
Test Solution III
Keq = 304.4 |
Fe3+ + SCN– ⇄ FeSCN2+ | ||
I
|
0.0010M | 0.00040M | 0 |
C
|
-x | -x | +x |
E
|
0.000913 | 0.000313 | 8.7×10^-5 |
Test Solution IV
Keq = 353.9 |
Fe3+ + SCN– ⇄ FeSCN2+ | ||
I
|
0.0010M | 0.00060M | 0 |
C
|
-x | -x | +x |
E
|
0.00086 | 0.00046 | 1.4×10^-4 |
Test Solution V
Keq = 297.6 |
Fe3+ + SCN– ⇄ FeSCN2+ | ||
I
|
0.0010M | 0.00080M | 0 |
C
|
-x | -x | +x |
E
|
0.00084 | 0.00064 | 1.6×10^-4 |
Test Solution VI
Keq = 267.7 |
Fe3+ + SCN– ⇄ FeSCN2+ | ||
I
|
0.0010M | 0.0010M | 0 |
C
|
-x | -x | +x |
E
|
0.00082 | 0.00082 | 1.8×10^-4 |
CONCLUSION AND EVALUATION:
- Comment on your Keq values. Do your results convince you that Keqis a constant value regardless of the initial concentrations of the reactants? Why or why not?
Our Keq values were all fairly close to the reported Keq of 280. The only two Keqs that were out of the ordinary were 304.4 and 353.9. We believe this is because of an error during the actual lab work. In the end when we calculated the percent difference including these values the % was still less than 10, as we got 7.22%. Without using those two values, the percent difference we calculated was less than 1, as we got 0.33%. Our results do convince us that Keq is a constant value regardless of the initial concentrations of the reactants as our percent differences were quite low. Our Keq values individually were also fairly constant being in the range of 267.7 to 353.9. Since both of these point in the direction of being close to the reported value, the Keq must be a constant value regardless of the initial concentrations.
- Calculate the average value of Keqfrom your five trials. The actual value of Keq for this reaction at 25oC is reported as 280. Calculate (should you use all of your values?) the percent difference of your average value from the reported value:
% difference using all 5 trials, including Keqs above 300 = (300.22 – 280) x 100% = 7.22%
280
% difference disregarding the Keqs above 300 = (280.93 – 280) x 100% = 0.33%
280