Science 10 H – Science Wonder Enquiry Project

How can scientists figure out what a celestial body is made of without ever having a physical sample of it?

[Paragraph1: What is spectroscopy?]

Spectroscopy is the branch of science concerning analysis, investigation, and measurement of spectra produced by splitting the light that passes through a gas into its constituent wavelengths. While the study isn’t solely used in astronomy, particularly finding itself uses when studying radiation, its most common field remains astronomy.

Spectroscopy began its roots in 1666 when Sir Isaac Newton showed that light from the sun could be split into a continuous series of colours, dubbing the anomaly a spectrum. Since then, the study has taken off, becoming a staple figure in uncovering details of celestial bodies throughout space.

 

[Paragraph2: How does spectroscopy function when studying celestial bodies?]

When light goes through gas, the gas absorbs patterns of wavelengths unique to every element. When looking at the absorption spectrum of that light, the wavelengths that were absorbed by the gas don’t appear. In their place are minute gaps where the absorbed wavelengths should be.

Because every element excludes distinct wavelengths from the spectra, the spectra that remain are the element’s spectral fingerprint, as no other element will remove the same pattern of wavelengths.

The study is more profound, as the information collected about the spectra of celestial bodies can show plenty about them. For instance, spectra can show every element that appears in a star, including its composition, density, and temperature.

Emission spectra of Carbon, Oxygen, Nitrogen and Iron.

Spectra can even show how stars and planets move, using the effect known as the Doppler effect, where because the incoming light’s wavelength is either stretched towards the red side of the spectrum (which is known as Cosmological Redshift and is an integral part of the Big Bang theory) or compressed towards the blue side of the spectrum because of movement and relativity.

[Paragraph3: Why is spectroscopy important?]

Spectroscopy is relevant because of its use in exploring the cosmos. The Doppler effect, Cosmological Redshift and by extension spectroscopy, are significant to the main theory of how the universe was created, and therefore it’s a vital tool in exploring more about the universe and everything in it.

The study can teach us loads about the fundamentals of how celestial bodies came to be, more about which exoplanets are most sustainable for human life, and rules of how the universe functions.

Science 10 – Paper Airplane Project

Because paper airplanes lack any kind of constant propulsion systems such as the ones of commercial airliners and fighter jets, gliding would be essential for their flying. But just how important is it? This experiment shows how, because there is more area for air under the wings, the plane with the largest wings flew farthest.

The 3 paper airplanes, dubbed “3,” “2,” and “1” respectively from top.

 

The experiment itself–each time the plane was thrown, written down on a chart. 

 

The experiment showed that the plane that would typically go farthest would be the plane with more area under the wings, with the average for flight length before hitting the floor almost 1 full meter longer than the other 2 aircraft (5.11 m to 414 m and 407 m). While the testing wasn’t that extensive, it did show that bigger wings means better gliding.


What I learned:

I learned, through the experiment and research that came with it, that there isn’t objectively a “best” paper aircraft, thanks to the many things that affect the flight distance of the plane, such it’s weight distribution, the specific type of paper, and the style/way the paper was folded. Even the slightest creases could cut the flight length in half in some situations.

I also learned some basic aerodynamics about wings. Basically, smaller wings produce less lift for the plane, but also less drag. The less drag means the aircraft goes faster, but the less lift means that it can’t carry nearly as much and needs speed to stay airborne, as well as gliding being practically useless. On the opposite side of the spectrum, bigger wings maximize the amount of area for which air gets caught under to create lift, but also drag. However, while the plane goes slower thanks to the drag, the high amount of lift means it can carry much more than it’s speedier counterpart, and is ideal for gliding around.

 

If I could repeat the experiment, what would I do differently?

If I had to repeat the experiment, I would try to control more of the variables, as some of the outputs were wildly unpredictable. One variable I couldn’t control was the exact area and dimensions of the wings, as the craftsmenship was rushed due to the limited amount of time for the experiment itself.