Category Archives: Socials 9
Natives peoples’ project
European influence on the First Nations people essay
Socials Industrial Revolution project
Socials Essay
The Plains Natives Presentation
Comparison of the English Revolution and French Revolution Socials Assignment
Socials 9 Due Date: Tuesday November 24 Name: Tasos________________
Comparison of the English Revolution and French Revolution
Your assignment:
Part One: To complete a comparison chart outlining the similarities and differences between the English and the French Revolution in 6 categories (one is done for you as an example) of your choice.
Be sure to consider the following as possible areas: (* must be covered)
- Monarchs (Kings/Queens)
- Parliament vs. Estates General
- Rebel or Revolutionary leaders
- Grievances or Causes of Revolution (can be broken down into more categories ie: social classes, taxes/money etc)
- Targets of Anger, Violence, Destruction or Battles
- Glorious Revolution vs. Directory
- Immediate and Long Term Consequences
- *Significance in history
Part Two: Based on what you have learned from studying the English and French Revolution, write a paragraph describing which country you believe the people gained the most benefits from their respective revolution? Be sure to also discuss each country’s detriments/losses as well as their gains in order to make an informed decision.
TOPIC
|
ENGLISH REVOLUTION
1625-1689 |
FRENCH REVOLUTION | SIMILARTIES | DIFFERENCES |
Kings
|
· Absolute monarchs
· James I: intelligent; slovenly habits; “wisest fool in Christendom”; didn’t make a good impression on his new subjects; introduced the Divine Right of Kings · Charles I: Believed in Divine Right of Kings; unwilling to compromise with Parliament; narrow minded and aloof; lived an extravagant life; Wife Henrietta Maria and people despised her (Catholic) · Charles II: supposed to rule as a constitutional monarch; tried to protect Catholic freedom · James II: openly Catholic, believed in Divine Right of Kings; instituted reign of terror due to rebellions against him |
· Absolute monarchs
· Louis XIV: known as the “Sun King”; saw himself as centre of France and forced nobles to live with him; extravagant lifestyle; built Palace of Versailles ($$) · Louis XV: great grandson of Louis XIV; only five years old when he became King; continued extravagances of the court and failure of government to reform led France towards disaster · Louis XVI; originally wanted to be loved; not interested in governing; did not help middle and lower classes; married Marie Antoinette who people despised (Austrian) · Louis allowed critics of government to be imprisoned or killed |
· Kings ruled as Absolute Monarchs
· Raised foreign armies · Charles I and Louis XVI both did not like working with Parliament/Estates General · Citizens did not like the wives of Charles I (Catholic) and Louis XVI (from Austria) · Both Charles I and Louis XVI punished critics of government |
· English Kings believed in Divine Right of Kings and French did not
· Charles I did not care to be loved whereas Louis XVI initially wanted to be loved by his people · Charles I did not kill people who were against him (he imprisoned or fined them) whereas Louis XVI did · Charles I called Lord Strafford, Archbishop Laud and occasionally Parliament; Louis XVI only called Estates General as he had no advisors |
Targets of Anger,Violence,Destruction or Battles
|
· The Fight with Parliament
· Charles refused to accept Parliament’s conditions · Charles tried to rule without parliament and he found unpopular ways to make money. · He was very hard on the people because of · Parliament made him sign a petition called the “Petition of Right” to protect the people · Charles did not agree with parliament and continued to rule without it. · He fought and tried to bring the country under royal control. Strafford found many ways to raise money for the king. · The Civil War: · When Charles raised his standard on a wind moor near Nottingham, he began a conflict that, for 7 years, would tear his country apart. · Both sides had to create a fighting force. · Charles had the “Royalists” or “Cavaliers” that could fight while riding horses. · Parliament had farmers and townspeople with almost no military experience but they also controlled the navy and the richest south and London. · Charles was successful at some points but he couldn’t win a decisive victory. · Parliament teamed up with the Scots · They began a modern army · The leader of the “New Model Army” was Oliver Cromwell · The New Model Army defeated the royalists in Marston Moor and Naseby. · Charles was made prisoner and handed to the parliament.
|
· A series of wars with the Dutch did secure some territory in the southeastern of France but also depleted his treasury. · Luis involved himself in the politics of the Holy Roman Empire by claiming that the French monarch had special rights within the Roman Catholic Church. · His persecution of Calvinist Protestants was so intense that caused a big decline in population in some parts of the country. · These conflicts almost ruined the economy. · During the reign of Louis XV, the extravagances of the court and the failure of government to reform economic and social life continued push France toward disaster.
· Citizens determined to keep order in Paris so they formed a new army called the “National Guard”
· It also declared all people equal before the law.
· The country was about to be invaded by forces that included many European émigrés who wanted to restore the king’s power so France declared war on Austria. · Marat, Danton, Robespierre and the others made patriotic speeches, telling people that foreign troops would destroy their country and all their hard earned rights.
|
· Both fought against themselves. |
|
Glorius Revolution vs. Directory
|
|
· The rule of Robespierre was replaced by the Directory
· The days of equality and the title “Citizen” was over. · Many of the advances made by the poor swept away.
|
· The French and the Glorious Revolutions both had a constitutional monarchy.
· Both reduced the power of a monarchy.
|
· Glorious –
Was not violent Results in a charter, Constitution with the people
· Directory- Bloody Tyrants emerge |
Revolutionary leaders
|
|
· He became a vigorous defender of the Sans-culottes, publishing his views in pamphlets, placards and newspapers, · He was a Friend of the People, · He was linked with the radical, republican Jacobin group that came to power after June 1793. · Marat was assassinated by Charlotte Corday, a Girondist sympathizer, · In his death, Marat became an icon to the Jacobins as a revolutionary martyr.
· Many historians describe him as “the chief force in the overthrow of the monarchy and the establishment of the First French
|
· Both tried to overthrow the King
· Both wanted more power for the people · Both Cromwell and Robespierre did not serve as kings
|
· Oliver Cromwell was more into the wars and the military and Marat, Danton and Robespierre was more into politics. |
Parliament vs. Estates General
|
|
|
· Both were invented to better rule the people through the Economy | · The estates general had 3 estates, commoners, clergy, and nobility. Parliament had 2, commoners and nobility.
· The estates general had given the king the ability to levy taxes. Parliament never gave the king that authority.
|
Queens
|
· Was queen of England, Scotland and Ireland from 1662 to 1685, · The wife of King Charles II.
|
|
· Both Henrietta, Catherine and Marie Antoinette participated in the revolutions.
· Catherine, Henrietta and Antoinette were unpopular.
|
· Marie Antoinette was more into the politics.
· Unlike all the queens of the English civil war, people hated Marie Antoinette for what she did to them.
|
Part 2: England and France had their rights but the country that went better was the French Revolution because the feudalism was popular and in the French Revolution.
Feudalism was very beneficial for the king but not for the third Estate, it was bad for the workers because they used feudalism in order to survive. Right of Man and Citizen legalized beliefs in all religions and made man equal before law that created freedom for the French. They had paper currency to the French. The idea of liberty, equality and fraternity to gain people’s benefits. Many people killed and peasants and landless could not get land or vote. This is what I think were the thing that made the French revolution better than the English.
Change Project
http://prezi.com/algvi_przobr/?utm_campaign=share&utm_medium=copy&rc=ex0share