Category: Socials 10

National Policy questions

1. To try and build a successful nation and he wanted to win votes.

2. A system of protective tariffs, increased immigration and the CPR. Tariffs would protects Canadians manufacturing, mining and agriculture by making Americas goods more expensive. They brought immigrants who were farmers so they could produce and export grain and would buy manufactured goods produced in Ontario and Quebec. The CPR would provide the ability to ship goods across Canada and form Asia. Also America wants to annex the west so if people settle there it will be harder for

3.George Stephen he owned the bank of Montreal ,Donald Smith who was a comissoner for the hbc,James J. Hill who was a coal trader.

4. He promised to give them $25 million in cash, a land grant of 25 million acres, and a monopoly west of Lake Superior for 20 years, the land they are getting is tax free until the sale of it.

5. They had to finish the railway within 10 years

6. They changed the planned route of the railway to go through the land between Saskatoon and Edmonton because the northern prairies was seen as good farmland and many land speculators into the area buying land that they hoped would be near the rail line. Also it would be faster to go straight through instead of going up and around. Many people already lived in the area so they would make more money than the people with the land

7. Because he had drive and energy. He also sped up the building of the railway.

8. He sped up the building of the railway. He laid almost 1500 km of track in the first 2 years.

9. They were running out of money, the Canadian government reluctantly passed a bill that provided them with $22.5 million for the railway. They used wooden tressels instead of metal tressels since it was cheaper.

10. Kicking horse pass

11. Usually they would take boats and go around south america. The mountains made it tough to get to the interior. They would take the American  railway to the coast of bc.

Genocide against Canada

(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical
destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
(B) (E)”I used to always fall asleep in class and get my hands rapped on, or my head bumped for falling asleep. But I could never sit in class. Always I was looking out the window hoping to go home, but it never happened.” -James Leon Sheldon

(B) (e)”So he came down the line and hit him over the head with the clipboard and told him, he says, “I told you when you hear your name called you say ‘here, sir’.” Well, I piped up and said that his name is not Michael, his name is Narookin (ph.). It was the only name I knew him by was his Indian name. I didn’t know his English name.” -Basil Ambers

(A)“The next month when we went home, the brother who was 2 years older than her passed away. Q. Was that from TB as well? A. Yeah.” – Cecile Ketlo

(C)“I don’t know how nutritious it was. They feed you mush in the morning, slimy mush. I don’t know how they cooked it. It didn’t taste too good. I believe it wasn’t fresh milk. They gave us powdered milk. Some of the students couldn’t eat the mush. They were getting sick and I remember the Nuns used to come and beat them up. They would say, “Other people are starving, you eat it.” They forced them to eat it. We used to get hamburger, big round hamburgers, and you would open it up and it’s just a shell and there’s grease in there.”  -Melvin Jack

(C)“And kids never having enough to eat. I think back on those days and I wonder was it during the Depression. Was that why there was so little food? Was it because food was rationed at that time? I guess in my own mind I’m trying to justify or make excuses why we didn’t have enough food. There was plenty of food on the table of the people who looked after us.” -Elsie Paul

(D)“If any of the girls had a boyfriend they always thought that we would go farther. They expected that of us and it wasn’t that way. I guess one of the things is we were never taught anything about sex. They just made us feel ashamed.” -Cecile Ketlo

 

Poll results

1. If you had a house full of mold and had no money would you trade your house for a job that paid you 240$ a year?

3 yes, 1 no

2. If you had a very expensive car with no gas, would you trade it for a cheaper car and with unlimited gas?

3 no, 1 yes

3. Would you sell a broken car with no steering wheel if you were starving for free groceries for a year?

3 yes, 1 no

4.If you owned a store that made no money, would you trade it for a job that made you 240$ a year?

4 no

5. If you had land that had no food or anything to make money off of it would you trade it for a smaller piece of land with lots of crops and animals to hunt so you can sell the furs?

4 yes

 

 

1.a the house represents the land that has no bison to hunt. They would be getting money for the land

B. They think the treaties were fair becsuse it is easy to give up a house that is useless to you and you are getting money for something you probably shouldn’t be.

2.a the car represents the land with no resources. The cheaper car represents the smaller piece of land that has resources on it.

B. They think the treaties wouldnt  be fair since the larger piece of land would be sold for more than what the smaller piece of land would be worth.

3.a the car is the land with no resources. The groceries represents the food on the smaller piece of land.

B. They think the treaties are fair because you wouldnt want to be starving and own land with no food on it or anything to gain from it.

4.a the store is the land.

B. They think this would be unfair because they could sell the land later on for way more than 240$.

5.a this is an exact representation of the situation

B. They think the treaties would be fair because you are getting something that will provide for you. Even though it is smaller you will make more money and have a better life on the smaller piece of land.

Canadas treatment towards Metis

Canada left the Metis alone for the not part. They let then create their own laws and Canada was not very upset about them leaving. They left for a god reason and Canada understood that. Their economy was based off buffalo hunting and there were not many buffalo left in the Manitoba area. Another issue was with the scrips. They were not very helpful since you didn’t know where or what type of land you were gonna get. This led the Metis to sell their scrips for a lot less than what they were worth, but it was going to make their life easier. When Lawrence Clarke came into this he ruined the Metis lives. He paid the Metis carriers very little and made their lives dificult. He also got a magistrate to enforce Canadian laws in the north west terriotries. Once he realized he had this power, he started pitting in laws that would only help the HBC which made life very dificult for the metis who moved there.

Battle of seven oaks

The_Fight_at_Seven_Oaks

“Battle of Seven Oaks.” – Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Web. 25 Nov. 2015.

The battle of seven oaks was caused because the NWC was upset due to these new settlers coming from Scotland were “part” of the HBC. Since the NWC was angry they decided to steal the HBC pemmican boats and their pemmican that the immigrants were eating. The NWC was trying to starve the immigrants to death. When the pemmican proposal was put into lave it made the NWC mad because they were thinking that the HBC was trying to stop their business and that they were ruling over everyone. The battle only lasted 15 minutes and start when Semple saw a group of NWC. When he stopped them he realized they were stealing the immigrants pemmican. Semple had only 21 men and the NWC had many more resulting in Semple being killed. After the fight many of the immigrants left. Selkirk also started caluring the NWC forts and arresting their people for the “masacre” of his men. The battle also resulted in them starting to talk about who should live in the Northwest and what kind of society should be there.

 

This image is from a neutral perspective showing that there are many more Metis the Semple’s men. It also shows Semple’s men being killed and it looks as if the Metis are the ones who are more experienced in fighting.

 

Guiding questions for aboriginal fur trade

1) How were Aboriginal people depicted in early accounts of the fur trade?
They were depicted as very hopeless and dependant on European supplies and technology.
2) What does newer evidence show to be more accurate about Aboriginals in the fur trade?
That the fur trade was much more than a business enterprise, and that it was a socio-cultural complex that lasted 200 years.
3) In what ways did Europeans adapt to Aboriginal economic traditions?
They had to improve the quality of their goods, and had to develop the concept of “made beaver”.
4) Why did Europeans have to adapt to Aboriginal commerce?
The Aboriginals had better geological trading connections.
5) How would you characterize Cree and Assiniboine economic ability and methods?
Ecologically fexible.
6) After 1670, how did the Cree and Assiniboine show their economic flexibility?
They pushed their trapping and trading area northwest.
7) How would you describe the Cree and Assiniboine inland trade strategies?
They had almost a monopoly on all trading.
8) How and why did the Aboriginal middlemens role change in the late 18th century?
It changed because the HBC started to establish inland posts. This meant that the two groups were just outnumbered by the abundance of connections the HBC had.
9) How did the Cree and Assiniboine retain independence from European technologies?
They changed to a grassland economy and started to buffalo hunt.