Yes, when we follow consequentialism, we can justify killing. But deontology would generally agree that killing is bad.
With the Holocaust though, we don’t accept it, so does that make it a universal right or wrong?
Sounds like with the environment, we should approach it as consequentialists? Or maybe clear cutting is too specific, is there a general way we should interact with the environment?
Yes, when we follow consequentialism, we can justify killing. But deontology would generally agree that killing is bad.
With the Holocaust though, we don’t accept it, so does that make it a universal right or wrong?
Sounds like with the environment, we should approach it as consequentialists? Or maybe clear cutting is too specific, is there a general way we should interact with the environment?
Good job!