Category Archives: Grade 9
Aquatic field studies
Introduction
The goal of this field research was to first, see how healthy the water in the Coquitlam river and is and second, see how it connects to the spheres of the earth. This connects to our studies of the spheres because water travels through all spheres. We looked at the biotic and abiotic elements that contribute to the biomes of the pond and river, such as nutrient measurements in the water using a water quality index and the living organisms that inhabit these environments. we used these two results to see and compare how good the water quality is.
Coquitlam river
To get the chemical values for the water quality index we put a stick in the water which indicates some of the values
Our measured values of the Coquitlam river is as follows
- Dissolved oxygen – 92% saturation – Q-value 95 – Weighted-Q21.65
- pH – 6.5units – Q-value 70 – Weighted-Q10.5
- Temperature change – 11-10=1°C – Q-value 88 – Weighted-Q12.32
- Nitrates – 20mg/L NO3 – Q-value 38 – Weighted-Q5.32
- Phosphates – 0.4 mg/L PO4 – Q-value 76 – Weighted-Q10.64
- Turbidity – 2NTU – Q-value 97 – Weighted-Q10.67
- Total dissolved salts – 50mg/L – Q-value 87 – Weighted-Q8.7
Approximate water quality index : 80
The water in the Coquitlam river is healthy, although it could still be better. It is a water source accepted by most animals and plants.
For the biotic part of this research, we put a net in the river and scrubbed the rocks in front of the net for the invertebrates to flow into the net.
In the river we found a few invertebrates. Specifically,
2 types of mayflies,
A caddisfly
A alderfly larva
Both mayflies and caddisflies in the river indicates that the water quality is good as they are very sensitive to water pollution and only lives in healthy water. The Alderfly larva means the water is above moderate quality but as mayflies and caddisflies are already there indicating good quality we can say for sure that the river is in good quality.
Oxbow pond
For the pond we used the same chemical stick as in the river
Our measured values of the Pond is as follows
- Dissolved oxygen – 90% saturation – Q-value 92 – Weighted-Q21.16
- pH – 7units – Q-value 88 – Weighted-Q13.2
- Temperature change – 15-14.3=0.7°C – Q-value 91 – Weighted-Q13.74
- Nitrates – 0mg/L NO3 – Q-value 98 – Weighted-Q13.72
- Phosphates – 5 mg/L PO4 – Q-value 13 – Weighted-Q1.82
- Turbidity – 8NTU – Q-value 80 – Weighted-Q8.8
- Total dissolved salts – 100mg/L – Q-value 85 – Weighted-Q8.5
Approximate water quality index : 79.94
The water in the Oxbow pond is similarly to the river, in good health. It supports a variety of life but can still be improved.
For the invertebrates in the pond we took a net, placed it under a log on the water, then gently tapped the log for the invertebrates to fall into the net
In the pond we found
A water boatmen
A dragonfly
And a tiny fish
Dragonflies indicates moderate or above water quality, and unfortunately we don’t know the sensitivity of water boatmen and the fish. Therefore, we know that the quality isn’t poor. however, it could be either good or moderate.
Comparing testing methods
The results of the Coquitlam river from the 2 ways of testing is very similar.
The results of the pond is a bit different as we couldn’t find any invertebrates to prove that the pond is in good quality.
Comparing the 2 sites
The final results from the 2 sites are very similar for the chemical test. The specific tests that have significant differences is Nitrates, Phosphates, Turbidity and total dissolved salts.
For the invertebrate test, the creatures we found in the river proved that the river is health while in the pond it proved it was moderate or above. another find was the invertebrates in the river generally smaller then the ones in the pond
Reflection
Doing this research was a fun experience, we got to go into the River and pond, learn how to identify invertebrates, and use the water quality index. Unfortunately some of the results in the water quality index test were from 5 years ago therefore the results may not be accurate. Overall I liked the water quality index test better because it is certain, unlike the invertebrate test where even if you don’t get any if the most sensitive invertebrates there is still the possibility of it being a healthy body of water.
Core competency – French – jeu de society
COL Science 9 – solution fluency – Eric He
Debrief
Overall I think we did pretty well on finding a solution and delivering it, we’re just not sure on the material cost the actually build the prototype in real life. But it seems like a simple machine and one that can be used for a while. One problem that we did realize later on is that cutting the seaweed doesn’t automatically bring the seaweed back. the seaweed will just float on the ocean. A solution we came up with was to put a big net on the machine, because even if the net doesn’t get all of the seaweed since the machine is constantly moving forward parts that are not within net range will follow through into the net.
Why do we like listening to music – Information Fluency
Reflection
- what question did you need to research in order to create your sway
First we asked ourselves what does the music do to our brain and what part of us processes it. From there we used what we learned like the system that processes hearing is the auditory perception system and asked questions like how that system works.
2. What new or familiar digital tools did you try to use as you worked through this project
Sway was a new tool but I think it was quite simple, but although I have used school recommended search engines like EBSCO and Gale engage they still give me a bit of trouble to use because unlike google, their search engines are unforgiving, you have to know exactly what you want and what question you have. It was much easier this time with the research questions made. I’ve also used Creative commons and Citation machine.
3. what was the process you used to investigate the topic and how did you verify and cite the information you found
The main way we verified the information was seeing if other sources said the same thing, but another strategy I used was looking up the author of the article or video.
4. How did the process of completing this challenged go? What could you have done better
Overall it went ok, between me not being at school for 1 day and my partner not being at school for 1 day, I think we communicated pretty well. Individually this project was a bit difficult for me on the researching part, but in the end I think it went alright.
HCE 9 – English Write
Tableau Novel – “TATDPI”
- Exposition, the exposition is the background information provided by the author, who, where, what, etc.
Junior was born into a poor family in the Spokane reservation. He is often starved, but he thinks that being poor makes it so that you can enjoy more things in the world, such as a bucket of chicken and drawing comics.
In this scene we used editing to make the comic junior was drawing stand out more.
2. Initiating incident, an event that starts the conflict.
When Juniors goes to his geometry class on the first day of high school, he discovers that the textbooks they were using were more than 30 years old. He got so mad he threw the book at his teacher.
In this scene we chose to draw in a book after so that we could also add the “swoosh swoosh” effect to show how the book was being thrown at Mr.P
3. Raising action, events leading up to and building up to the climax
Junior transferred schools from the reservation school to Rearden a “white” school, while Junior was facing discrimination, this one kid called Roger, was making him think they wanted a fight. So, Junior punched Roger, and gained respect from the school.
In this scene we made Roger drop very low, because how junior punch him and he was very stunned and kind of frightened.
4. Raising action II
During science class, the teacher was talking about petrified wood. And Junior said that petrified wood isn’t actually wood and explained why. The teacher got mad, but Gordy, the smartest kid in class confirmed that what Junior was saying is true. This was the first time anyone in Rearden had stood up for Junior.
In this scene we tried to make Gordy on the lower level because it is almost embarrassing to stand up for a “Indian” kid
5. Raising action III
Penelope, the most popular girl at Rearden, has a secret. Penelope has bulimia, when Junior discovers this, he waited by the washroom door *with destiny* he comforted Penelope to the best of his abilities. And they became friends.
In this scene we did some postproduction editing to label destiny to make it clearer.
6. Climax, this is the most exciting point. It is the turning point in the story where either the protagonist is successful or not in meeting his/her goals.
Junior playing with the Rearden team has a basketball game against his previous school and his best friend Rowdy. Because he moved to another school, he has been spending increasingly less time with Rowdy. He was never better at basketball than Rowdy, so he wanted to prove that he hasn’t been doing nothing at the new school by beating Rowdy at basketball.
In this scene we put Junior on the high level because this is like his moment, and we put rowdy on the low level because he is surprised and disappointed in himself.
7. Falling action, cleaning up the conflict.
Mutiple people Juniors are very close to died, including Mary (his sister), his grandmother, and Eugene (Junior’s dad’s best friend). Every one of them died somehow because of alcohol. And Junior is now in deep sorrow because of it.
In this scene we put junior on the low level because of the sorrow he is in.
8. Conclusion, how the story ends, and a wrap up.
While Junior is back in his house sad because of the recent deaths, Rowdy comes to visit him. Although they both miss each other, they wouldn’t say so. They went to the basketball court and decided to play basketball just like they did in the old times.
In this scene we put both Junior and Rowdy on the high level because they are excited to finally play normally like they did when they were kids again.
Indigenous Exploration – “Living conditions”
Indigenous Exploration – “Living conditions” Podcast
Reflections
My experience with this assignment was ok, we only had a few problems but one of them was severe. The overall experience was fun, largely due to the fact that my partners are also very cooperative and hardworking. My group took quotes from various sources and sites related to the topic, then we just put them on a word document as points that we planned to say in the podcast. One of the biggest obstacles we encountered was with the microphone, the microphone was very muffled, and you could barely hear anything from the recording. And we decided to try using a different device to record, we wasted an entire class trying to figure it out and trying to find an adapter for Mac, just to realize that it does not need an adapter. We ended up solving this problem the next day using the mic with the MacBook to record. Communication was a problem at the start, because 1 of my partners did not have any social media, we could not simply make an Instagram group chat. Luckily all 3 of us were in French Immersion so we shared many classes, we were able to use those classes to easily find each other and find time to work on this project.