Category Archives: Socials 9

Victorian Era vs. Today-Theme: Continuity & Change

“Very materialistic and spent money on clothes, accessories, fine furnishings.” I categorized it as continuity because that’s what we still spend our money on today. A lot of us spend our money on materialistic items such as clothing, accessories, and fine furnishings and the style of those items has changed since then. In order for us to live our everyday normal lives, we rely on these items, just as people before did. We buy clothing to look presentable to others and to keep warm, and jewelry because of how it looks, and it has personal significance to some individuals. We use fine furnishings such as beds, couches, chairs etc. throughout our day multiple times. Just as the people from the Victorian Era did. Taking everything into account, I decided to classify the statement “Very materialistic and spent money on cloths, accessories, fine furnishings.” As continuity dur to the fact that we still spend our money on these items today.

“Clothing was very formal: women wore long dresses and aprons; men wore hats, suits, and ties.” I decided to categorize this statement as change cause people in the 1800’s used to dress like this on a daily basis. But fashion has changed drastically through time. People today wear clothing that are more casual. The clothing we wear today include jeans, hoodies, leggings, t-shirts and more. Though we do dress formally on some occasions. Women today will wear dresses, skirts, and fancy looking blouses. Men today will wear suits and ties similar to men before, but not daily. Fashion is a high priority and it was especially during the Victorian Era. In he 1800’s, if your outfit was more deluxe and elegant looing, it would been because you were richer. Now, it all depends on what brand of hoodie or the brand of your shoes, for example Vans or Champion. In conclusion, the statement “clothing was very formal: women wore long dresses and aprons; men wore hats, suits, and ties.” Would be categorized as a change because of its elaborate development created overtime.

Governing Quebec

As a British official, I realize there are many alternatives to governing Quebec. I have chosen the policy of isolation to ensure the colony is properly run. I chose this policy because territories are created for each groups of peoples. They are protected by their government and each territory had its own system of government, language, and religion. I believe that isolation would be quite fair. For example, getting deported, that could cause conflict because of people not being where they want to be. it could also cause the economy to fall. forcing people to leave means forcing people to leave and quit their jobs. it would take a while to get things up and running again. Assimilation would also cause conflict because some of the natives/French may not agree with the enforcements brought upon them. Also, it would hard to govern. I based my decision of fairness and what I think is equal. As I have outlined above, I believe the best policy for governing Quebec is isolation. This will ensure that the colony will remain under British control and provide wealth for our glorious country.