Karla's Blog

my riverside rapid digital portfolio

Author: Karla (Page 1 of 4)

Protein Synthesis

Protein Synthesis 

Proteins are made of a long chain of amino acids which is being coded for by DNA. The order of the basis of DNA determines which protein is made by coding for a specific order of amino acids.

Transcription
  •  DNA is converted into mRNA through transcription
  •  A copy of the small required portion of DNA will be created
  • It’ll transport the desired protein’s genetic code from the nucleus to the ribosomes in the cytoplasm

Unwinding and unzipping

When a gene is switched on RNA polymerase attaches to DNA and causes it to unzip this is called the initiation stage

complementary base pairing with DNA

RNA is similar to DNA but does not contain thymine but instead contains uracil when there’s a strand of DNA messenger RNA or mRNA for short would pair up the adenine with the uracil. This stage is called elongation

separation from DNA

When the RNA polymerase reaches a stop code, it detaches from the DNA and the mRNA is complete. The mRNA exits the nucleus and moves into the cytoplasm where it finally finds a ribosome to start the next phase of protein synthesis known as translation.

 

 

Translation

Messenger RNA → (to) protein is the process which is called translation because we’re translating that information into a polypeptide sequence.

Initiation

The initiation phase is where the ribosome gets together with the mRNA and the first tRNA in the cytoplasm

elongation

When the tRNA transfers the amino acids to the ribosome, elongation occurs and the amino acids begin to link up to create a chain. Elongation should continue until the mRNA reads a stop codon.

 

termination

The amino acid chain is released at the termination point, resulting in a sequence of amino acids that eventually form polypeptide chains and proteins.

 

 

 

a) The models that we made in class accurately reflected the process because we were able to demonstrate the key components involved in protein synthesis and explain their roles by rearranging them on a board, so our models appropriately show the process. The colour-coded paper was a big help as well since it differentiates the function of each part so it wouldn’t confuse us. In a way since it is a less detailed version than the actual protein synthesis it also misrepresents the real process because it only contains the main process. A change that I would have made is to include more auditory and 3d/kinesthetic versions of the model because it would cater better to peoples learning styles and students would get educational benefits from those models.

b) Yes, I think models are a very effective way to educate the public about science because it caters to a lot of different learning styles this one is mainly a visual learning style. I find it more effective since it is way easier and more understandable to look at the visual aspect that goes along with the supporting text to understand the full concept of it instead of reading a long and wordy article or essay about it which would seem less appealing for the public to learn and read about.  With the use of the models, the information would be basic and straightforward enough that those in the audience who are unfamiliar with the subject can quickly and effectively learn it.

Sources:

Amoeba Sisters – Protein Synthesis 

Class OneNote (CYU protein synthesis) (Protien synthesis transcription)

Biology 12 in-class book

 

Consonance and Assonance

 

https://create.kahoot.it/share/consonance-assonance/ee8ccf77-9f49-42e2-b692-93341e6de914

 

Flame Test Lab – Core Competency – Chemistry 11

LiNO3 – Red, pink

KNO3 – Orange

CuNO3 – Green, Yellow

Zn(NO3)2 – Light Orange

Ca(NO3)2 – Red

Sr(NO3)2 – Orange, pink 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

⬇Photos of Lab⬇

Flame Test Exploration

MCN11 – CC Self Assessment

Core Competencies – Spanish 11

Mind Map – “A Private Experience”

Mind Map – “A Private Experience” Karla Flamenco ← PDF Version

 

L’Histoire et moi

Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download

My Field Journal Digital Showcase

Fly Agaric Page Link ↓

Cherry Laurel Page Link ↓

Ladybug Page Link ↓

Grasshopper Page Link ↓

 

What Darwin Never Knew

1. How did the discovery of DNA prove that Darwin’s theory of evolution was correct? (Note: James Watson & Francis Crick, with the aid of Rosalind Franklin, discovered the structure of DNA in 1953. Charles Darwin died in 1882).

Darwin’s original theory of evolution was “descent with modification.” His theory was that in order for a species to survive, all organisms must change. In addition, he believed that all species shared a common ancestor. After the discovery of DNA, this was proven to be true. “We are now able to see the genes that were responsible for the evolutionary change,” as stated in the video What Darwin Never Knew. The video implies that thanks to the discovery of DNA, scientists can now see the specific genes that are directly responsible for a species’ evolution. Darwin’s theory was correct because he believed that organisms would have to make minor changes in order to thrive in their environment. As a result of the discovery of DNA, we can now see those subtle variations up close.

2. How does it change the way we view evolution today

Since Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution, people’s perspectives on evolution have shifted dramatically. The discovery of DNA has opened up a world of possibilities that we could never have imagined. As stated in the video What Darwin Never Knew, all you need to do to compare two creatures is look at their DNA. What they mean in the video is that scientists can now see the evolution on a larger scale. That we can look at a creature’s DNA and identify the organism as well as where it came from as a species. This was unthinkable during Darwin’s lifetime. Because of human discoveries, we can now see evolution in a broader and more complex light. Rosalind Franklin and Charles Darwin are both credited with laying the groundwork for modern evolution. That scientist can now build on that base to produce new discoveries on a daily basis.

3. How does it change the way we view and study evolution in the future?

Scientists will be able to follow changes in species over lengthy periods of time using DNA. This can be done now with fast-adapting insects, bacteria, and microorganisms, but doing it on a larger scale will be the future of evolutionary research. Because the discovery of DNA is still relatively recent, there hasn’t been much time to watch species that adapt more slowly, therefore these changes can’t be documented right now. In the “What Darwin Never Knew” film, it is said that chimps and humans share 99 percent of their DNA, with the majority of the differences being in the switches that turn these on and off. Many big species changes could occur in the future as a result of switch manipulation.

Other Reseach Sources :
J., Futuyma Douglas, et al. “Evolutionary Biology Today and the Call for an Extended Synthesis.” Interface Focus, 18 Aug. 2017, https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsfs.2016.0145
Mayr, Ernst. “Darwin’s Influence on Modern Thought.” Scientific American, Scientific American, 24 Nov. 2009, https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/darwins-influence-on-modern-thought1/
“What Darwin Didn’t Know.” Smithsonian.com, Smithsonian Institution, 1 Feb. 2009, http://-https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/what-darwin-didnt-know-45637001/

Spanish 10 – Core Competency Reflection – El Salvador Menu

Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download

Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download

Page 1 of 4

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén

Skip to toolbar