May 10

Comic Strip Questions

  1. Why did the rebellion begin?

HBC was selling Rupert’s Land without consulting the Metis.

  1. What was Louis Riel’s role in the rebellion?

    Reil formed the National Metis Committee in order to fight for Metis rights, including the right to their land.

  2. How did McDougall allow for the provisional government to gain power?

He left Canada when announcing he was Lieutenant Governor.

  1. What are the main points of the Metis List of Rights?

They wanted the same rights that other provinces had.

  1. What role did Donald Smith play?

    Donald was the Senior Officer of the HBC.

  2. What happened to Thomas Scott and how did that affect the rebellion?

    Thomas believed Metis were inferior to the Europeans, and was executed for treason. This resolved tension between Metis and Canadians.

  3. Describe how the agreement between the Metis and Canada was made.

    Schultz spread racist propaganda all over Ontario about the Red River Delegation. When Riel arrived in Ontario he had to have a difficult negotiation with John A. Macdonald about Metis rights. By the end of the negotiation he granted the land to the “Children of the Metis” creating the province of Manitoba.

  4. What role did Colonel Woseley play after the rebellion?

    Sent out by John A. Macdonald, his job was to keep peace until the transfer of government power was complete

  5. What happened to Riel after the agreement was made with Canada to create Manitoba?

All members of provincial government were granted amnesty except for Riel, who was exiled to the US.

May 9

Who owns Rupert’s Land?

 

Belongs to the Metis Belongs to the HBC/Britain/Canada
-Metis ancestors arrived before Europeans
-Most of the populatin was Metis
-Independent and not reliant on Canada
-Europeans had different culture than Metis
-Claimed Land
-Europeans were suprior to Metis
-Britain took ownership of the land before Metis
-Economy of Red River depended on the HBC

The Metis had a right to complain about the sale of Rupert’s Land because their ancestors resided there before the Europeans arrived. There was no race or competition for the land so they did not think of claiming it. Britain can’t sell a land that’s not their’s. Metis were not informed of the sale of Rupert’s Land. Because the Metis did not claim the land, the British though it was theirs. People were taking the Metis’ land and, the British did not care about who lived there first. The Metis were great contributors to the economy, so it was no way fair the way they were treated. This whole issue is unfair to the Metis because no one even though to consult them about the sale of their land.

Modern-day Analogy:

A boy bought a bike, but never used it. His friend wants to ride it, but he the boy doesn’t allow that because he decides to ride it when his friend wanted to ride it as well.

May 6

Battle of Seven Oaks Explained

The Battle of Seven Oaks was a battle between Robert Semple, of Selkrik (Hudson’s Bay Company) and Cuthbert Grant who lead the Metis (NWC) in to battle.

The HBC was expanding in to NWC territory which forced the Metis to move. Selkirk, invited colonists to settle between Metis and NWC, to provide food. Selkirk couldn’t grow enough food, so they couldn’t provide to Metis. Selkirk colonists depended on pemmican trade with Metis, but governor of the New Selkirk colony, Miles Mcdonnell passed a Pemmican Proclamation, which declared that no pemmican could be taken out of the colony to provide to the NWC, and banned buffalo running, which was a hunting strategy where you drive a buffalo herd of a cliff. The Metis fought back by threatening colonists, burning crops and houses, and stealing livestock and agricultural tools. In early 1816, NWC had captured HBC’s pemmican boats, stolen the pemmican and taken over the fort. They were hoping to starve the Selkirk settlers by blocking their pemmican supply. When Grant was taking the pemmican back to their own fort, Semple rode out to stop what he believed was a small group of NWC men, he was mistaken. No one knows who fired the first shot, but what is known is that all 21 of Semple’s men, including Semple himself were slaughtered, by about 60 of Grants men, only one of Grant’s men died. The battle only lasted 15 minutes. As a result of this battle, the colonists left. Selkirk responded by arresting men and capturing NWC forts. Metis now feel threatened by the British, because they believe they might change their way of life. The conclusion derived from these events were that buffalo hunting and permanent agriculture cannot co-exist.

I think this painting is showing the Metis’ perspective because on the painting, the Metis are shown as powerful superior people than the Slekirk. The selkirk are portrayed as weaker “warriors”, or “soldiers”, because most of them are on the ground in pain, or standing still not showing any motion. Also, the painter painted them with lighter, more washed out colors that the Metis, which may imply weakness.

“Battle of Seven Oaks.” Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, n.d. Web. 06 May 2016. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Seven_Oaks>.

May 4

Read pp 138-142 Guiding Questions

1)They commonly spent the season with

local First Nations, and eventually traders began marrying the daughters

of local First Nations families. This practice was encouraged and accepted,

as First Nations women generally had free choice in whom they were to

marry. As well as creating social connections, the marriages also firmed

loyalty and economic ties between the traders and the First Nations with

whom they worked. Also, as you have seen, First Nations women brought

valuable skills and knowledge that proved vital to the European traders

and to the fur trade itself.

2)NWC, because the Metis get a big chunk of their income from pemmican sales, which the NWC buys a lot of for their hunting travels.

3)First-Nations are Metis, but those with British and First-Nations ancestry preferred the term “Country Born”

4)The Metis spoke a variation of the French language.

5)They were the ones who actually went out to hunt the bisons, and other animals.

6)They had to use strategies and various horse riding skills to hunt these animals.

7)The women and children drove the Red River carts, that were pulled by horses and oxen and used to transport the meat. Hunters rode buffalo runners, which are fast, agile horses speacially trained for hunting.

8)Even though the Metis are technically French and First-Nations, they are more First-Nations, because they hunt a lot, but without guns, and they supply large companies instead of controling one.

May 3

Guiding Questions for Aboriginal Fur Trade

1)They had minor roles, an depended on European technology to survive.

2)In his 1958 History of the Hudson’s Bay Company, E.E. Rich noted ‘the marked tendency for Indians to become dependent on the traders, and the danger threatening the trader and the Indian alike if shipping failed and they became completely dependent on the resources of the country.’ It (sic) fact it was the English who were in danger of starvation without the fish, caribou, and geese supplied to them by Cree hunters. There is no evidence that Cree hunters were reduced to relying on the English.

3)The Europeans had to learn about and adapt to Aboriginal cultures, languages, and lifeways. Long before the arrival of Europeans, Aboriginal people had traded furs and many other goods over geographically immense networks, and Europeans were obliged to adapt to these networks.

4)Because they had to learn how to trade furs and travel complicated complex water networks.

5)Really skilled and able to adapt to rapid changes of any sort.

6)They moved their trapping and trading area northwest to become the middle man in the process of the HBC business and this forced the Europeans to work with them.

7)Really smart and thought out to work.

8)They created a trade monopoly that acted as a blockade on the trade of other companies.

9)They didn’t use guns to hunt. And this meant that they didn’t need metals and other resources to hunt.

April 28

Charlottetown, Quebec, and London Conferences

The Charlottetown Conference, Quebec Conference and the London Conference

Spring, 1864, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick and Prince Edward Island were discussing the possibility of a Maritime Union.

But BNA has bigger problems, and they want to join the conference to shine a light on the legislative of Canada East, and Canada West. It was decided that they would hold the meetings in Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island. The first meeting would begin September 1, 1864. Representatives were appointed from the Province of Canada, and the Three Maritime colonies that originally discussed union. Newfoundland asked belatedly if it might attend, but there wasn’t enough time to organize a delegation.

First person to arrive was Robert Dickey of Nova Scotia, on August 30th, his four delegates arrived the next day; New Brunswick’s delegates arrived the same late evening. The Canadians arrived in the morning of September 1st.

Proceedings began on the afternoon of September 1st, with the appointment of officers. The conference was following Parliamentary Protocol, Canadians were only observers. They made their presentations about union the next day, when invited to do so by the Maritime delegates. Once the presentations started, talk about Maritime Union disappeared from the conference agenda. Since the proceedings were closed, there exists little information about was said in the presentations. However it is known that George-Étienne Cartier and John A. MacDonald presented the argument in favor of union, that Alexander Galt discussed the posible financial arrangements, and that George Brown the form that a united government might take.

The Conference also included various social events that were just as important as the business. Activities included the famous oyster and champagne lunch aboard the Canadians’s ship, luncheons at the home of local delegates and officials, seaside excursions, and a grand ball at the legislative building. The letter George Brown sent to his wive during the Conference vividly explains these events.

The meetings at Charlottetown were adjourned on September 9, 1864, but the delegates continued with meetings in Halifax, Saint John, and Fredericton. It was decided that the idea of British North American union was worthy enough to hold a second conference for. The second conference was scheduled to begin October 10, 1864 in Quebec City.

Quebec Conference, October 10-27, 1864

The same delegates who met in Charlottetown met in Quebec City the next month, in a building overlooking the St. Lawrence River. In this meeting the delegates of the colonies established the 72 Resolutions, these resolutions are the basis for the upcoming London Conference.

The London Conference, December 1866

Only sixteen delegates traveled to England for discussion. Meetings began December 4th, at the Westminster Palace Hotel in London. They choose Canada as the name of the united colonies.

In addition of the BNA Act, the Conference had to endure the presence of an anti-union delegation form Nova Scotia, which was led by Joseph Howe, he was determined to overturn any union agreement. Charles Tupper was busy countering each submission.

The delegates completed the text for the bill and was submitted to the Queen on February 11. The bill was passed. And the BNA Act received the Royal Assent on March 29, 1867.

The Delegates returned home to prepare for union, which is scheduled to take place on July 1st.

April 21

Internal Political Causes of Confederation

Double Majority: To make a bill a law, the majority of the Legislative Assembly of Canada East and Canada West had to for the decision. Because French Canadians were a minority compared to English Canadians. Because there were more English than French, the French couldn’t maintain their language, because they would never win anything by a majority vote.

Independents: Politicians who did not belong to a party, but still wanted to vote. The problem with independents were that they affected the amount of seats both colonies had in parliament, and they could overrule bills.

Equal Representation vs Representation by Population: Canada West was against equal representation because even though they had a greater population, they had no advantage against Canada East, because both colonies had equal number of seats in the government. This wouldn’t be a problem if it didn’t cause constant disagreement.

Representation by population is a way of government seat organization by population. Because they were more English-speaking population, the English got more seats. And because French-speaking population were the minorities they got less seats in parliament. This meant the French could never vote out the English.

April 20

Between 1861 and 1865, several southern states declared their secession from the United States and formed the Confederate States of America. The united states government rejected the southern secession and declared that the act was a rebellion. The Confederate states fought against the northern states about slavery and political decisions in a war. In 1865 the war ended with the North defeating the south. Britain and France both proclaimed neutrality in the war. But Britain’s cotton business was doing really well, and they needed their cotton shipments from South america. Ships from the north started doing blockades against these shipments, but Britain started using fast small ships instead of big slower ones as a solution. This made North Americans suspicious because even though Britain declared neutrality, they were still favoring the south. This increased tension between Americans and the British.

The Trent Affairs

November 1861, an American Warship stopped the British Mail ship called “Trent”, which was carrying 2 agents back to Britain. They were going to Britain to ask for support for the “Confederate Cause”. Even though they were on neutral waters, the Americans took the two agents prisoners. Britain threatened retaliation if the prisoners weren’t released. American President Abraham Lincoln freed the prisoners because he didn’t want to go to war with Britain while also fighting the Confederates. Tension still remained, and Americans wanted revenge. Britain dispatched 14,000 troops to BNA.

St. Alban’s Raid

In 1864, a group of Confederate soldiers attacked the town of St. Alban’s, Vermont, using Montreal as their base. After the attack soldiers escaped back across the border to avoid prosecution. The United Sates government was angry and they would threaten BNA if future attacks were not turned over to American authorities. This threat from the US made the British realize that they have no defense.

United States Expansionism: Manifest Destiny

The Manifest Destiny was the belief that the United States was destined to control all of North America. During the 1840s, the Americans were expanding across the continent. The US saw the North-West lands of the continent as a rich sources of natural resources. The outbreak of the American Civil War strengthened the sense of Manifest Destiny. A group of American vocal expansionists believed the United States should turn its attention to the annexation of British North America. Although the ultimate goals of Manifest Destiny were never reached, the popularity of the idea undoubtedly weighed on the minds of many British North American leaders and Presidents.

Using the above, explain how the political context in the 1860s would encourage the BNA colonies to unite or stay apart:

It would encourage them to unite because they were dealing with a common enemy. The Confederate States.

April 19

The Economic Situation in the 1860s

The construction of the railway encouraged British North America Colonies to unite.The railways helped transport resources, from one colony to another. Because Lower Canada was experiencing a depression they needed the Americans to sign the Reciprocity Treaty; which is a treaty allowing the ownership and transport of goods from on colony to another, which included the United States. The Corn Law kept prices of grain high, but when the law was “removed”, it led to an economic failure in Canada. This forced Canada rebuild their economy by uniting the colonies.

April 13

Why the Rebellion of 1837 failed

According to L.A. Norton the rebellion was poorly armed, had no drill or discipline and none of them knew how to properly use a weapon, but despite of that, they still went to battle. A narrative written by Mackenzie states that because of lack of training, some of their men were shot by allies. When the men in the first row of the firing squad fell down so the row in the back could shoot, the row in the back thought they were overpowered by the enemy, and because of this they retreated. If we summarize Sydney Bellingham’s writings, we’ll learn that the rebels were cowards, who wanted to make a change, but they just didn’t have the proper training or artillery to do so.

And this is “Why the Rebellion of 1837 failed”.