May 20

Residential School Survivor Story Analysis

UN Convention on Genocide:

Article 2

In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent

to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;

Carole Dawson: “Like I say, unfortunately many of the people I was in school with have died. Many of them have died tragic deaths. A lot of them have been murdered. Some of them through alcohol and drugs have killed themselves. There aren’t too many people that I went to school with that survive.”

(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

Grant Severight: “I loved my grandparents. I would have stayed in the bush with them rather than being put in a Residential School. I remember missing them and the dislocation I felt, the disconnection I felt to my family. Eventually that whole dislocation and disconnection kind of built walls in me that took me years to deconstruct again. The feeling of inferiority I felt —”

“ In Marieval there was sexual abuse. I experienced some sexual abuse but it was from older boys, not from the staff.” “He didn’t injure me or anything but he used to fondle me and that kind of stuff. But he learned it from a supervisor. He used to tell me. He learnt that off Brother so-and-so. George did pass away after he left school, but he was the guy who used to do that kind of stuff.” “t throughout time I come to believe it because Father Sharon (ph.) spent a lot of time with that lady. That’s where my sexual abuse happened was in St. Philip’s. Q. From the older boys? A. No. From the music teacher.”

“And then they had a guy by the name of Rocky (something). He was a supervisor. He was convicted not of sexual assault but he was convicted of physical assault on the boys. Q. What kind of things did he do? A. He burnt them with cigarettes. He whipped them. He used to set up sweat lodges and just burn the boys while they were in there.”

Carole Dawson: “Probably the abuse that happened there. It’s not only my own abuse. I saw the abuse of other students. That was very compelling for me to see young girls getting taken out of their dorms at odd hours; eleven in the evening and midnight, and to hear them whimpering and crying and then find them in the bathroom later. I didn’t understand then about sexual abuse. It wasn’t explained to us by our parents or our Elders, or these people that operated the schools. But I knew there was something wrong.”

(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical

destruction in whole or in part;

Grant Severight explaining how one school was better than the other, and what kind of things they got there that he didn’t in his old school: “I remember getting cookies and a glass of milk. I mean, it was the real milk that tasted good. The other stuff we had was always powdered stuff. I remember, man, was this ever different. And the meals were different. I remember having corn flakes, boiled eggs, toast, and I remember at dinner time we would get hot dogs and bags of chips and hamburgers, and a full course meal at supper time, just completely different.” “And I remember the boys were given access to guitars. We could play little guitars. They had bikes there, too, that we had to share. Man, I really hit the big time here. It was a completely different world.” “One of the things that stands out for me is I was constantly being punished. I was being either whipped or made to wash toilets because I physically attacked supervisors who beat the children, for instance, with radiator brushes. My cousin, Bob Joseph, who is one of the Residential School guys in BC, his wife is my cousin, her and I were always getting punished because we were always trying to defend the little children.”

(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

//

(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

//

May 12

Canada’s treatment of the Metis after the creation of Manitoba

After Manitoba was created, Metis though they were going to be able to choose their own land, and their children’s lands. After five years of waiting to choose their lands, they instead got scrips. Metis were often taken advantage of and given nothing.  The children got land that had no access to water, and was located far from their families. The Metis were tired of waiting for land that they were not given and being taken advantage of, so they sold their scrips for far less than they were worth and moved to North West Territories. Harsh winters in the NWT forced the Metis before hunt before the Bison season, breaking the St. Laurent Laws. The hunt captain apprehended the offenders. Lawrence Clarke didn’t have the Metis best interests in mind, he felt like Europeans were far more superior than the Metis. The hunt captain was arrested and the original offenders were pardoned, and the St. Lawrence Laws were rendered useless by the Metis who did not care the laws. The creation of the Transcontinental Railway brought too many hunters, and this decreased the huntable Bison population. This created and economic failure.

Canada’s treatment of the Metis was unfair, and unprofessional, there was no justifiable reason to treat the Metis this way.

May 10

Comic Strip Questions

  1. Why did the rebellion begin?

HBC was selling Rupert’s Land without consulting the Metis.

  1. What was Louis Riel’s role in the rebellion?

    Reil formed the National Metis Committee in order to fight for Metis rights, including the right to their land.

  2. How did McDougall allow for the provisional government to gain power?

He left Canada when announcing he was Lieutenant Governor.

  1. What are the main points of the Metis List of Rights?

They wanted the same rights that other provinces had.

  1. What role did Donald Smith play?

    Donald was the Senior Officer of the HBC.

  2. What happened to Thomas Scott and how did that affect the rebellion?

    Thomas believed Metis were inferior to the Europeans, and was executed for treason. This resolved tension between Metis and Canadians.

  3. Describe how the agreement between the Metis and Canada was made.

    Schultz spread racist propaganda all over Ontario about the Red River Delegation. When Riel arrived in Ontario he had to have a difficult negotiation with John A. Macdonald about Metis rights. By the end of the negotiation he granted the land to the “Children of the Metis” creating the province of Manitoba.

  4. What role did Colonel Woseley play after the rebellion?

    Sent out by John A. Macdonald, his job was to keep peace until the transfer of government power was complete

  5. What happened to Riel after the agreement was made with Canada to create Manitoba?

All members of provincial government were granted amnesty except for Riel, who was exiled to the US.

May 9

Who owns Rupert’s Land?

 

Belongs to the Metis Belongs to the HBC/Britain/Canada
-Metis ancestors arrived before Europeans
-Most of the populatin was Metis
-Independent and not reliant on Canada
-Europeans had different culture than Metis
-Claimed Land
-Europeans were suprior to Metis
-Britain took ownership of the land before Metis
-Economy of Red River depended on the HBC

The Metis had a right to complain about the sale of Rupert’s Land because their ancestors resided there before the Europeans arrived. There was no race or competition for the land so they did not think of claiming it. Britain can’t sell a land that’s not their’s. Metis were not informed of the sale of Rupert’s Land. Because the Metis did not claim the land, the British though it was theirs. People were taking the Metis’ land and, the British did not care about who lived there first. The Metis were great contributors to the economy, so it was no way fair the way they were treated. This whole issue is unfair to the Metis because no one even though to consult them about the sale of their land.

Modern-day Analogy:

A boy bought a bike, but never used it. His friend wants to ride it, but he the boy doesn’t allow that because he decides to ride it when his friend wanted to ride it as well.

May 6

Battle of Seven Oaks Explained

The Battle of Seven Oaks was a battle between Robert Semple, of Selkrik (Hudson’s Bay Company) and Cuthbert Grant who lead the Metis (NWC) in to battle.

The HBC was expanding in to NWC territory which forced the Metis to move. Selkirk, invited colonists to settle between Metis and NWC, to provide food. Selkirk couldn’t grow enough food, so they couldn’t provide to Metis. Selkirk colonists depended on pemmican trade with Metis, but governor of the New Selkirk colony, Miles Mcdonnell passed a Pemmican Proclamation, which declared that no pemmican could be taken out of the colony to provide to the NWC, and banned buffalo running, which was a hunting strategy where you drive a buffalo herd of a cliff. The Metis fought back by threatening colonists, burning crops and houses, and stealing livestock and agricultural tools. In early 1816, NWC had captured HBC’s pemmican boats, stolen the pemmican and taken over the fort. They were hoping to starve the Selkirk settlers by blocking their pemmican supply. When Grant was taking the pemmican back to their own fort, Semple rode out to stop what he believed was a small group of NWC men, he was mistaken. No one knows who fired the first shot, but what is known is that all 21 of Semple’s men, including Semple himself were slaughtered, by about 60 of Grants men, only one of Grant’s men died. The battle only lasted 15 minutes. As a result of this battle, the colonists left. Selkirk responded by arresting men and capturing NWC forts. Metis now feel threatened by the British, because they believe they might change their way of life. The conclusion derived from these events were that buffalo hunting and permanent agriculture cannot co-exist.

I think this painting is showing the Metis’ perspective because on the painting, the Metis are shown as powerful superior people than the Slekirk. The selkirk are portrayed as weaker “warriors”, or “soldiers”, because most of them are on the ground in pain, or standing still not showing any motion. Also, the painter painted them with lighter, more washed out colors that the Metis, which may imply weakness.

“Battle of Seven Oaks.” Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, n.d. Web. 06 May 2016. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Seven_Oaks>.

May 4

Read pp 138-142 Guiding Questions

1)They commonly spent the season with

local First Nations, and eventually traders began marrying the daughters

of local First Nations families. This practice was encouraged and accepted,

as First Nations women generally had free choice in whom they were to

marry. As well as creating social connections, the marriages also firmed

loyalty and economic ties between the traders and the First Nations with

whom they worked. Also, as you have seen, First Nations women brought

valuable skills and knowledge that proved vital to the European traders

and to the fur trade itself.

2)NWC, because the Metis get a big chunk of their income from pemmican sales, which the NWC buys a lot of for their hunting travels.

3)First-Nations are Metis, but those with British and First-Nations ancestry preferred the term “Country Born”

4)The Metis spoke a variation of the French language.

5)They were the ones who actually went out to hunt the bisons, and other animals.

6)They had to use strategies and various horse riding skills to hunt these animals.

7)The women and children drove the Red River carts, that were pulled by horses and oxen and used to transport the meat. Hunters rode buffalo runners, which are fast, agile horses speacially trained for hunting.

8)Even though the Metis are technically French and First-Nations, they are more First-Nations, because they hunt a lot, but without guns, and they supply large companies instead of controling one.

May 3

Guiding Questions for Aboriginal Fur Trade

1)They had minor roles, an depended on European technology to survive.

2)In his 1958 History of the Hudson’s Bay Company, E.E. Rich noted ‘the marked tendency for Indians to become dependent on the traders, and the danger threatening the trader and the Indian alike if shipping failed and they became completely dependent on the resources of the country.’ It (sic) fact it was the English who were in danger of starvation without the fish, caribou, and geese supplied to them by Cree hunters. There is no evidence that Cree hunters were reduced to relying on the English.

3)The Europeans had to learn about and adapt to Aboriginal cultures, languages, and lifeways. Long before the arrival of Europeans, Aboriginal people had traded furs and many other goods over geographically immense networks, and Europeans were obliged to adapt to these networks.

4)Because they had to learn how to trade furs and travel complicated complex water networks.

5)Really skilled and able to adapt to rapid changes of any sort.

6)They moved their trapping and trading area northwest to become the middle man in the process of the HBC business and this forced the Europeans to work with them.

7)Really smart and thought out to work.

8)They created a trade monopoly that acted as a blockade on the trade of other companies.

9)They didn’t use guns to hunt. And this meant that they didn’t need metals and other resources to hunt.

April 28

Charlottetown, Quebec, and London Conferences

The Charlottetown Conference, Quebec Conference and the London Conference

Spring, 1864, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick and Prince Edward Island were discussing the possibility of a Maritime Union.

But BNA has bigger problems, and they want to join the conference to shine a light on the legislative of Canada East, and Canada West. It was decided that they would hold the meetings in Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island. The first meeting would begin September 1, 1864. Representatives were appointed from the Province of Canada, and the Three Maritime colonies that originally discussed union. Newfoundland asked belatedly if it might attend, but there wasn’t enough time to organize a delegation.

First person to arrive was Robert Dickey of Nova Scotia, on August 30th, his four delegates arrived the next day; New Brunswick’s delegates arrived the same late evening. The Canadians arrived in the morning of September 1st.

Proceedings began on the afternoon of September 1st, with the appointment of officers. The conference was following Parliamentary Protocol, Canadians were only observers. They made their presentations about union the next day, when invited to do so by the Maritime delegates. Once the presentations started, talk about Maritime Union disappeared from the conference agenda. Since the proceedings were closed, there exists little information about was said in the presentations. However it is known that George-Étienne Cartier and John A. MacDonald presented the argument in favor of union, that Alexander Galt discussed the posible financial arrangements, and that George Brown the form that a united government might take.

The Conference also included various social events that were just as important as the business. Activities included the famous oyster and champagne lunch aboard the Canadians’s ship, luncheons at the home of local delegates and officials, seaside excursions, and a grand ball at the legislative building. The letter George Brown sent to his wive during the Conference vividly explains these events.

The meetings at Charlottetown were adjourned on September 9, 1864, but the delegates continued with meetings in Halifax, Saint John, and Fredericton. It was decided that the idea of British North American union was worthy enough to hold a second conference for. The second conference was scheduled to begin October 10, 1864 in Quebec City.

Quebec Conference, October 10-27, 1864

The same delegates who met in Charlottetown met in Quebec City the next month, in a building overlooking the St. Lawrence River. In this meeting the delegates of the colonies established the 72 Resolutions, these resolutions are the basis for the upcoming London Conference.

The London Conference, December 1866

Only sixteen delegates traveled to England for discussion. Meetings began December 4th, at the Westminster Palace Hotel in London. They choose Canada as the name of the united colonies.

In addition of the BNA Act, the Conference had to endure the presence of an anti-union delegation form Nova Scotia, which was led by Joseph Howe, he was determined to overturn any union agreement. Charles Tupper was busy countering each submission.

The delegates completed the text for the bill and was submitted to the Queen on February 11. The bill was passed. And the BNA Act received the Royal Assent on March 29, 1867.

The Delegates returned home to prepare for union, which is scheduled to take place on July 1st.